Under the circumstances, one might be tempted to conclude that the worst has passed. In terms of the ‘armageddon’ risk of systemic banking failures, that may well be the case: administrations around the world have raided a) taxpayers and b) the future in order to lay down a protective moat of liquidity around the ailing banking sector. But before we all go skipping over the sunlit uplands hand-in-hand chasing unicorns toward a rosier tomorrow, it should be borne in mind that the banks, like many inhabitants of the now shattered economic landscape, are in no position to regain their former profit-generative heights any time soon. Pimco’s Mohamed El-Erian refers to the current environment (in which we are likely to be becalmed for some considerable time) as one of DDR: De-leveraging, De-globalization and Re-regulation. The puppy of the state (what Ronald Reagan called an alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other) is now running uncontrollably around the living room, leaving messes here and there and trashing the economic furniture. As Luke Johnson put it in the FT last Wednesday,
“The backlash against free market economics is growing. From the demented new laws surrounding hedge funds and private equity proposed by the European Union, to the 50%-plus income tax rates introduced in the UK, to the nationalisation of Chrysler, socialism is in the ascendance.”
And his military metaphor is bang on. When the government parks its tanks on capitalism’s lawns, that spells trouble for those who invest, add value and create jobs. Trillion dollar bailouts do not only leave massive public sector deficits in their wake (so the outlook for government bonds is less promising than the economic textbooks on deflation would have us believe), they also leave the presence of the heavy hand of government “all over industry and markets”.
Philosopher Alain de Botton advised us at the end of April to shake off our misplaced optimism. There is good reason to believe that the only thing we really have to fear is not fear, but hope. It is hope that is luring investors back into the stock market, also known as the fear of missing out. But two sunny days do not constitute a new environment of global warming. And the meteorological analogy is probably fair: we may be able to forecast one or two days ahead with reasonable accuracy, but try a month. The same holds for the stock market. A surge in liquidity has temporarily buoyed stocks, but the economic future remains fraught. Investors will be well served by holding to a plan, rather than allowing their investment strategy to be dictated by the random oscillations of a febrile market desperate for good news.
Among Pimco’s conclusions are that it makes sense to favour
“credit spreads higher up in the economic and capital structure and, increasingly, on an even more international basis”.
We couldn’t agree more. There has been a giant sucking sound in the markets over recent months as investors have stampeded, not just into oversold equities of uncertain value, but into corporate bonds. On a selective basis that makes sense, but in the aggregate, the corporate bond market, we would argue, is now overvalued. And the trend is dangerous, because corporate default rates are almost certain to rise further as the slowdown (illusory green shoots withstanding) winds on and consumers rebuild their balance sheets as opposed to resume their previous spending habits. The stand-out value, we would suggest, is in debt issued by highly creditworthy sovereign issuers (versus both corporates and fundamentally indebted G7 sovereign issuers) – more on this theme in due course.
Regards,
Investment Team |